The Development of Interpretation Styles in Qur’anic Exegesis
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the development of various interpretative styles in the exegesis of the Qur’an. It addresses research questions related to the historical roots of the emergence and diversity of interpretative styles and the various approaches scholars employ in interpreting the Qur’an from the classical to the modern-contemporary periods. This study is necessary because Qur’anic exegesis represents the intellectual endeavour of understanding the various explanations of the Qur’anic verses as the word of Allah SWT — Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala (Glorified and Exalted Be He). Explanations of the Qur’an initially came directly from the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), followed by the companions, the successors (tabi’in), the successors of the successors (tabi’ut tabi’in), and various groups and sects that emerged after that, up to the present time. This development also coincided with the spread of Islam across different regions, accompanied by the advancement of knowledge and the emergence of various schools of thought and philosophical perspectives. This paper employs a qualitative method with literature analysis. The results of the literature analysis indicate that the historical roots of the emergence and diversity of interpretative styles, as well as the various approaches used by scholars in interpreting the Qur’an from the classical to the modern-contemporary periods, emerged alongside the development of knowledge, the spread of Islamic teachings, and the rise of various Islamic schools of thought. This eventually gave rise to various interpretative styles, such as linguistic (lughawi), philosophical (falsafi), scientific (‘ilmi), jurisprudential (fiqh), mystical or Sufi (tasawuf), educational (tarbawi), theological (i’tiqadi or kalam), rhetorical and explicative (balaghi and bayani), and revolutionary (haraki) styles.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adz-Dzahabi, M. H. (2005). al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun (1st–3rd ed.). Dar al-Hadith.
Al-‘Aridhi, A. H. (1994). Tarikh Ilm al-Tafsir wa Manahij al-Mufassirin (Translated by Ahmad Arkom) (1st ed.). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Al-Ayubi, S. Y. … Mokodenseho, S. (2023). Penggunaan Metode Audiolingual dalam Maharah Istima’ di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Kahfi Hidayatullah Surakarta. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 1839–1845. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.530
Al-Farabi, A. N. M. bin al-F. (1907). Fushush al-Hikam. al-Sa’adah.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (n.d.). Jawahir al-Qur’an. Percetakan Kurdistan.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (1356). Ihya ‘Ulum al-Din (1st ed.). al-Tsaqafah al-Islamiyah.
Al-Khuli, A., & Zayd, N. H. A. (2004). Metode Tafsir Sastra (translated by Khairon Nahdiyyin) (K. Anwari (ed.)). Adab Press.
Anwar, R. (2008). Ilmu Tafsir. Pustaka Setia.
Arib, J. M., & Mokodenseho, S. (2020). Mushaf Bone: Telaah Aspek Kodikologi, Tulisan, Teks dan Visual Al-Qur‟an. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/u3qwm
Arib, J. M., & Mokodenseho, S. (2022). Interpreting the Quran According to the Opinions of the Companions. An-Nubuwwah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 123–147. https://journal.iaimkotamobagu.ac.id/index.php/annubuwwah/article/view/10
Arib, J. M. … Mokodenseho, S. (2022). The Inheritance of Human Traits in the Qur’an Based on the Scientific Interpretation of Zaghlūl Rāghib Muḥammad an-Najjār. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 6(2), 863–886. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i2.4199
Asy-Syurbasi, A. (1999). Sejarah Perkembangan Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim (1st ed.). Kalam Mulia.
Bahren, R. S. A., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023a). Metode dan Corak Penafsiran Ath-Thabari. Mushaf Journal: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadis, 3(1), 151–166. https://mushafjournal.com/index.php/mj/article/view/126
Bahren, R. S. A., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023b). The Taḥlīlī Method in the Interpretation of the Qur’ān. Mushaf Journal: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadisan Hadis, 3(1), 167–182. https://www.mushafjournal.com/index.php/mj/article/view/128
Ichwan, M. N. (2004). Tafsir ’Ilmi: Memahami al-Qur’an melalui Pendekatan Sains Modern.
Ikhwan al-Shafa. (1928). Rasail Ikhwan al-Shafa. al-Mathba’ah al-Arabiyah.
Ja’far, M. M. A. A. (1984). Asar al-Tatawwur al-Fikriy fi al-Tafsir. Muassasah al-Risalah.
Kamarudin, K., & Mokodenseho, S. (2022). A Debate on the Islamic Practice of Pilgrimage to the Grave: Study of the Hadīth on Grave Pilgrimage for Women. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 6(2), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i2.4390
Mokodenseho, S. … Sabir, R. (2024). Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Use of Tafsir in Islamic Religious Education on the Achievement of Character Education of Junior High School Students in Central Java. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v2i02.230
Mustaqim, A. (2008). Pergeseran Epistemologi Tafsir. Pustaka Pelajar.
Shihab, M. Q. (2003). Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Mizan.
Shihab, M. Q. … Umar, N. (1999). Sejarah & ’Ulum al-Qur’an (A. Azra (ed.)). Pustaka Firdaus.
Syahrur, M. (1992). Al-Kitab wa al-Qur’an; Qira’ah Mu’ashirah. al-Ahali lit-Thaba’ah wa an-Nasyr wa at-Tauji’.
