Standard Operating Procedure of Jarh Wa Ta’dil Science as A Basis for The Sanad Criticism Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper discusses what is called the standard operating procedure of the science of jarh wa ta’dil in its use as a method of criticizing the sanad of hadith. It must be admitted that the hadith as the second source of Islamic guidance after the Qur'an is not free from various academic-scientific problems. From here, the discussion of jarh wa ta’dil finds its urgency. This paper is a qualitative literature research that produces findings in the form of descriptive and explanatory words about jarh wa ta’dil. This paper does not discuss the entire main theme of jarh wa ta’dil, but limits it to the issue of definition, urgency and significance, causes and conditions, and effects of jarh wa ta’dil. This paper finds that jarh wa ta’dil as the basis for the method of criticizing the sanad of hadith which is typical of the intellectual treasury of Islam is the fruit of an awareness of the urgency of an intellectual, argumentative and critical framework of thought. A scholar is required to have certain criteria before arguing about a narrator or a hadith. A scholar who does not have the skills and competence is prohibited from becoming a critic of hadith because jarh wa ta'dil has legal consequences for a narrator or a hadith.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abdul Hadi, A. M. ibn A. Q. ibn. (1998). Ilmu Al-Jarh wa Al-Ta’dil Qawaiduhu wa Aimmatuhu.
Abi Al-Fadhl, J. (2003). Lisanul Arab. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Abu Lawy, A. (1997). Ilmu Ushul Al-Jarh wa Al-Ta’dil. Dar Ibn Affan.
Abu Zahwu, M. (n.d.). Al-Hadis wa Al-Muhaddisun. Matba’ah al-Ma’rifah.
Ahmad, Z. (2008). Muslim Philosophy of History. In A. Tucker (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography (hal. 439–440). Blackwell Publishing.
Al-Adlabi, S. ibn A. (1983). Manhaj Naqd Al-Matan. Dar al-Afaq al-Jadidah.
al-Duri, A. A. (1957). Al-Zuhri: A Study on the Beginnings of History Writing in Islam. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 19(1), 1–12.
Al-Qaththan, M. (2005). Pengantar Studi Ilmu Hadits. Pustaka al-Kautsar.
Al-Quat, S. (2003). Al-Manhaj Al-Hadits fi ’Ulum Al-Hadits. Dar al-Tajdid Lilthaba’at wa al-Nasyr wa al-Tarjamah.
Ash-Shiddieqy, M. H. (1997). Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis. Pustaka Riski Putra.
Belkzi, A. I. (2011). Takwîn al-Majal al-Siyasi al-Islamiy: al-Nubuwwah wa al-Siyâsah. Markaz Dirasah al-Wahdah al-‘Arabiyyah.
Brown, J. A. C. (2011). Muhammad: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Donner, F. M. (1998). Narratives of Islamic Origins: The Beginning of Islamic Historical Writing. The Darwin Press.
Donner, F. M. (2010). Modern Approaches to Early Islamic History. In C. F. Robinson (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 1 The Formation of the Islamic World Sixth to Eleventh Centuries (hal. 628–630). Cambridge University Press.
Kaelan. (2010). Metode Penelitian Agama Kualitatif Interdisipliner. Paradigma.
Kasiram, M. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif-Kuantitatif. UIN Maliki Press.
Landau-Tassaron, E. (1986). Processes of Redaction: The Case of the Tamimite Delegation to Prophet Muhammad. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 49(2), 253–270.
Lecker, M. (1995). Waqidi’s Account on the Status of the Jews of Medina: A Study of Combined Report. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 54(1), 15–32.
Marhumah, E. (2016). Ulumul Hadis: Konsep, Urgensi, Objek Kajian, Metode dan Contoh. Suka Press.
Mazid, A. A. A.-B. (2010). Mu’jam Al-Mushthalahat Al-Haditsiyah. Maktabah Iman.
Moleong, L. J. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ritonga, M. T. (2022). Metodologi Ulama Hadis dalam Jarh dan Ta’dil. Al-Kaffah, 10(2), 205–224.
Saifuddin, M., Muhid, & Nurita, A. (2023). Manhaj Jamaluddin Al-Qasimi dalam Penerapan Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 13(2), 1–10.
Schoeler, G. (2006). Writing and Publishing: On the Use and Function of Writing in Early Islam. In J. E. Montgomery (Ed.), The Oral and the Written in Early Islam (hal. 62–86). Routledge.
Sizgorich, T. (2004). Narrative and Community in Islamic Late Antique. Past & Present, 185, 9–42.
Srifariyati. (2020). Urgensi Ilmu Jarah Wa Ta’dil dalam Menentukan Kualitas Sebuah Hadis. Madaniyah, 10(1), 131–147.
Wahid, R. A., & Matondang, H. A. (2011). Kamus Lengkap Ilmu Hadis. Perdana Publishing.
Zubaidillah, M. H. (2018). Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’Dil. Studi Hadis, 02(02), 1–14.